🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Trend

Across Europe, a growing chorus of countries are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". A law could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the move does not establish binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid foundation," commented the parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing disturbing platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a influential peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is largely unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further use needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed laws demanding parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain figures to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans carry risks and "might backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this worldwide debate continues, the steps of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.